Majority
Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Anthony F. Aloi, J.), rendered January 4, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the fourth degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her, following a plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 155.30 [1]). We agree with defendant that her waiver of the right to appeal was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 , 262 [2011]; see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 , 256 [2006]); thus, it does not encompass defendant’s contentions that the award of restitution was not based on evidence in the record and that County Court should have held a hearing with respect to the amount of restitution (cf. People v Tessitore, 101 AD3d 1621 , 1622 [2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 1104 [2013]). Defendant, however, failed to preserve for our review those contentions inasmuch as she did not object to the amount of restitution at sentencing, nor did she request a hearing (see id.; People v Lewis, 89 AD3d 1485 , 1486 [2011]). In any event, defendant conceded “the facts necessary to establish the amount of restitution as part of a plea allocution” (People v Consalvo,
Cases cited
- People v. Bradshaw 18 NY3d 257 at 262 p. 1420
- People v. Lopez 6 NY3d 248 at 256 p. 1420
- People v. Tessitore 101 AD3d 1621 at 1622 p. 1420
- People v. Lewis 89 AD3d 1485 at 1486 p. 1420
- People v. Consalvo 89 NY2d 140 at 145 p. 1421
- People v. March 21 AD3d 1393 at 1393 p. 1421
- People v. Ford 86 NY2d 397 at 404 p. 1421