Majority
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lizbeth Gonzalez, J.), entered March 7, 2012, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In opposition to defendants’ prima facie showing that plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury to his lumbar spine in a March 2007 automobile accident, plaintiff submitted an affirmed report by his radiologist finding a herniated lumbar disc. That finding alone is insufficient to establish a serious injury; additional objective medical evidence of significant physical limitations resulting from the herniation is required (Pommells v Perez, 4 NY3d 566 , 574 [2005]; Wetzel v Santana, 89 AD3d 554 , 555 [1st
We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Freedman and Feinman, JJ.
Cases cited
- Pommells v. Perez 4 NY3d 566 at 574 p. 500
- Wetzel v. Santana 89 AD3d 554 at 555 p. 500
- Phillips v. Tolnep Limo Inc. 99 AD3d 534 at 534 p. 501
- Toure v. Avis Rent A Car Systems, Inc. 98 NY2d 345 at 350 p. 501
- Soho v. Konate 85 AD3d 522 at 523 p. 501
- Jno-Baptiste v. Buckley 82 AD3d 578 p. 501