Majority
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weber, J.), rendered December 4, 2009, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The County Court properly denied the defendant’s request to conduct a Frye hearing (see Frye v United States, 293 F 1013 [DC Cir 1923]), with respect to a latent fingerprint comparison identifying him as a perpetrator in the charged crime. New York
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, since he did not demonstrate the necessity for the appointment of fingerprint experts on his behalf under County Law § 722-c, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying his request to appoint such experts (see People v Moore, 125 AD2d 501 [1986]; see also People v Robinson, 70 AD3d 728 , 728 [2010]). Skelos, J.P., Balkin, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Wernick 89 NY2d 111 p. 920
- People v. LeGrand 8 NY3d 449 p. 920
- People v. Wesley 83 NY2d 417 p. 920
- People v. Burnell 89 AD3d 1118 at 1121-1122 p. 920
- People v. Wofford 66 AD3d 1404 at 1404 p. 920
- People v. Moore 125 AD2d 501 p. 920
- People v. Robinson 70 AD3d 728 at 728 p. 920