Majority
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Edward D. Garni, J), entered September 11, 2003. The order granted the motion of defendant Bombard Car Co., Inc. for summary judgment on its counterclaim and directed entry of judgment against plaintiff in the amount of $100,000.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs.
Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the motion of Bombard Car Co., Inc. (defendant) for summary judgment on its counterclaim to recover the amount due on a promissory note executed by plaintiff, along with interest and “the reasonable costs of collection, including reasonable attorneys’ fees in the amount of $1,017.50.” Defendant met its initial burden by submitting proof of the note and plaintiffs default, and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to his defense of lack of consideration (see A. Bella Food Corp. v Luigi’s Italian Deli, 243 AD2d 592 [1997]; Falco v Thorne, 225 AD2d 582 ,
Cases cited
- Fleet Bank v. Rozanski 216 AD2d 938 at 938 p. 961
- Friends Lumber, Inc. v. Cornell Development Corp. 243 AD2d 886 at 886-887 p. 961
- Mastro v. Carroll 296 AD2d 802 at 802-803 p. 961