Majority
Determination of respondent New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA), dated July 3, 2012, which approved a Hearing Officer’s decision to deny petitioner’s grievance seeking succession rights as a remaining family member to the tenancy of his late mother, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Cynthia Kern, J.], entered February 1, 2013), dismissed, without costs.
Substantial evidence supports the determination that petitioner is not entitled to succession rights as a remaining family member (RFM) (see generally 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176 , 180-181 [1978]). The record establishes that petitioner’s occupancy of the subject apartment was not pursuant to NYCHA’s written permission (see Matter of Rahjou v Rhea, 101 AD3d 422 [1st Dept 2012]; Matter of Adler v New York City Hous. Auth., 95 AD3d 694 [1st Dept 2012], lv dismissed 20 NY3d 1053 [2013]), and there exists no basis to disturb the Hearing Officer’s finding that petitioner’s
We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Freedman and Clark, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2012 NY Slip Op 314580J).]
Cases cited
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human Rights 45 NY2d 176 at 180-181 p. 531
- Rahjou v. Rhea 101 AD3d 422 p. 531
- Adler v. New York City Housing Authority 95 AD3d 694 p. 531
- Bailey v. Village of Saranac Lake, Inc. 20 NY3d 1053 p. 531
- Café La China Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority 43 AD3d 280 at 281 p. 532