Majority
We affirm. The record reflects that County Court distinguished the right to appeal from the rights forfeited by the
Defendant’s claim that his plea was not knowing, intelligent and voluntary is not preserved for our review absent evidence that defendant moved to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction, and the narrow exception to the preservation requirement is not applicable, as defendant made no statements during the plea allocution that cast doubt upon his guilt or negated an essential element of the crime (see People v Williams, 101 AD3d 1174 , 1174 [2012]; People v DeJesus, 96 AD3d 1295 , 1295 [2012]). Defendant’s assertion that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel also is unpreserved for our review in the absence of an appropriate postallocution motion (see People v Gruber, 108 AD3d 877 , 878 [2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 956 [2013]; People v McGowan, 98 AD3d 1192 , 1192 [2012]), and reversal in the interest of justice is unwarranted (see People v Gantt, 84 AD3d 1642 , 1643 [2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 858 [2011]). Finally, defendant’s valid appeal waiver precludes review of his contention that the sentence was harsh and excessive (see People v Ball, 108 AD3d 871 , 871-872 [2013]; People v Musser, 106 AD3d 1334 , 1335 [2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 997 [2013]).
Peters, P.J., Stein and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Cases cited
- People v. Johnson 106 AD3d 1331 at 1332 p. 1001
- People v. Lopez 97 AD3d 853 at 853 p. 1001
- People v. Williams 101 AD3d 1174 at 1174 p. 1001
- People v. DeJesus 96 AD3d 1295 at 1295 p. 1001
- People v. Gruber 108 AD3d 877 at 878 p. 1001
- People v. McGowan 98 AD3d 1192 at 1192 p. 1001
- People v. Gantt 84 AD3d 1642 at 1643 p. 1001
- People v. Ball 108 AD3d 871 at 871-872 p. 1001
- People v. Musser 106 AD3d 1334 at 1335 p. 1001