Majority
Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court erred in granting that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) to vacate an order dated July 18, 2012, granting the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) and 3016 (b) to dismiss the first, second, third, and fourth causes of action upon the plaintiff’s default and, thereupon, denying the defendant’s motion. A plaintiff seeking to vacate a default in appearing or answering pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default and a potentially meritorious cause of action (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Bistre v Rongrant Assoc., 109 AD3d 778 , 778 [2013]; Sussman v Jo-Sta Realty Corp., 99 AD3d 787 , 788 [2012]). Here, while the defendant does not challenge the
Cases cited
- Bistre v. Rongrant Associates 109 AD3d 778 at 778 p. 644
- Sussman v. Jo-Sta Realty Corp. 99 AD3d 787 at 788 p. 644
- Karsanow v. Kuehlewein 232 AD2d 458 at 458 p. 645
- Zanani v. Savad 217 AD2d 696 at 697 p. 645
- Tung v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. 105 AD3d 709 at 711 p. 645
- Consolidated Bus Transit, Inc. v. Treiber Group, LLC 97 AD3d 778 at 779 p. 645
- High Tides, LLC v. DeMichele 88 AD3d 954 at 957 p. 645
- Yellow Book Sales & Distribution Co. v. Hillside Van Lines, Inc. 98 AD3d 663 at 664-665 p. 645
- Canario v. Gunn 300 AD2d 332 at 333 p. 645
- Wilner v. Allstate Insurance 71 AD3d 155 at 167-168 p. 645