Majority
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), imposed August 2, 2012, upon
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the prosecutor made improper remarks during sentencing is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, without merit. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentencing court properly considered the objectives of sentencing and the court’s comments “ ‘merely reflect the fact that the court was taking into consideration the nature of the crime, a legitimate factor in determining an appropriate sentence’ ” (People v Anderson, 287 AD2d 574 , 574 [2001], quoting People v James, 216 AD2d 489 , 489 [1995]). Furthermore, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Dickerson, J.P, Leventhal, Hall and Lott, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Anderson 287 AD2d 574 at 574 p. 972
- People v. Suitte 90 AD2d 80 p. 972