← Cases

Marshall v. Hayes

118 A.D.3d 646 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2014-06-26 English

Judges Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Acosta, Freedman, Richter and Clark, JJ.

Contents

Majority

p. 646
In the Matter of Nathan F. Marshall, Petitioner, v Roger S. Hayes et al., Respondents.
[988 NYS2d 85]

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Eractice Law and Rules, now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Acosta, Freedman, Richter and Clark, JJ.