Majority
It is hereby ordered that the adjudication so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Supreme Court was authorized to impose a sentence of imprisonment and probation following the revocation of the original sentence of probation (see Penal Law § 60.01 [4]; People v Krawcyk, 130 Misc 2d 253 , 254 [1985]). Contrary to the contention of defendant, the imposition of a sentence of imprisonment upon the second revocation of probation did not place him in double jeopardy (see generally People v Tucker, 272 AD2d 992 [2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 872 [2000]; People v Johnson, 159 AD2d 725 , 726 [1990]). Present—Pigott, Jr., PJ., Green, Pine, Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Krawcyk 130 Misc 2d 253 at 254 p. 1072
- People v. Johnson 159 AD2d 725 at 726 p. 1072