Majority
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for defamation, the defendants appeal, as limited by their notice of appeal and brief,
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the defendants’ contention, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs leave to serve a second amended complaint to the extent it alleged causes of action sounding in defamation and libel per se (see CPLR 3025 [b]; Giblin v Murphy, 73 NY2d 769 [1988]; Pirrotti & Pirrotti, LLP v Estate of Warm, 8 AD3d 545 , 546 [2004]; Arcuri v Ramos, 7 AD3d 741 [2004]). Prudenti, EJ., Ritter, H. Miller and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Giblin v. Murphy 73 NY2d 769 p. 585
- Arcuri v. Ramos 7 AD3d 741 p. 585