Majority
Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (Frederick G. Reed, A.J.), rendered December 19, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal contempt in the first degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of criminal contempt in the first degree (Penal Law § 215.51 [c]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court properly admitted uncharged crimes as Molineux
Even assuming, arguendo, that the court erred in admitting such evidence, we conclude that the error is harmless. The evidence of defendant’s guilt is overwhelming, and there is no significant probability that defendant would have been acquitted but for the error (see People v Laws, 27 AD3d 1116 , 1117 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 758 [2006]; see generally People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 , 241-242 [1975]).
Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.
Present— Scudder, PJ., Peradotto, Carni and Lindley, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Erle 83 AD3d 1442 at 1444 p. 1549
- People v. Alvino 71 NY2d 233 at 242 p. 1549
- People v. Ray 63 AD3d 1705 at 1706 p. 1549
- People v. Laws 27 AD3d 1116 at 1117 p. 1549
- People v. Crimmins 36 NY2d 230 at 241-242 p. 1549