Hyperlawhypertext legal database Watts v. Stolz 121 A.D.3d 580

← Cases

Watts v. Stolz

121 A.D.3d 580 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2014-10-23 English

Judges Concur — Friedman, J.E, Sweeny, Acosta, Saxe and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Contents

Majority

p. 580
In the Matter of Rodney Watts, Petitioner, v Robert Stolz et al., Respondents.
[995 NYS2d 501]

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same

p. 581
hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Concur — Friedman, J.E, Sweeny, Acosta, Saxe and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.