Majority
Defendant did not preserve his claim that the court erred by imposing sentence without conducting an inquiry into the validity of defendant’s guilty plea (see e.g. People v Thompson, 32 AD3d 743 [1st Dept 2006], lv denied 9 NY3d 870 [2007]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. The record establishes the voluntariness of the plea (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536 [1993]), and, at sentencing, the court gave defendant an opportunity to discuss the claims he made in his pro se presentencing submissions to the court. Defendant, who never said that he was moving to withdraw his plea, expressly stated that he was ready to proceed with sentencing. Moreover, he made only generalized complaints about police practices in unrelated cases against other persons, and about his counsel’s performance. Accordingly, the circumstances did not warrant further inquiry.
Concur — Friedman, J.E, Renwick, Moskowitz, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Fiumefreddo 82 NY2d 536 p. 546