Majority
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Berkowitz, J.), rendered June 20, 2012, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, or intelligent because the allocution was factually insufficient is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not move to withdraw his plea (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662 , 665 [1988]; People v Fisher, 119 AD3d 813 [2014]). Moreover, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the exception to the preservation requirement does not apply here because the defendant’s plea allocution did not cast significant doubt on his guilt, negate an essential element of the crime, or call into question the voluntariness of his plea (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d at 666 ; People v McClinton, 118 AD3d 915 [2014]). In any
The defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708 , 712-713 [1998]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 , 147 [1981]).
Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Roman and Maltese, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Lopez 71 NY2d 662 at 665 p. 646
- People v. Seeber 4 NY3d 780 at 781 p. 647
- People v. Winbush 199 AD2d 447 at 448 p. 647
- People v. Benevento 91 NY2d 708 at 712-713 p. 647
- People v. Baldi 54 NY2d 137 at 147 p. 647