Majority
Judgment, Supreme
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 , 348 [2007]). The circumstantial evidence, including a videotape of defendant’s actions at the time of the fire and evidence of his motive, supported the conclusion that he set the fire.
Defendant received effective assistance under the state and federal standards (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708 , 713-714 [1998]; Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 [1984]). The record establishes that counsel advised defendant against testifying, but also advised him that the ultimate decision to testify was a decision to be made by defendant personally (see People v Perry, 266 AD2d 151 , 152 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 95 NY2d 856 [2000]).
We find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated.
Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Renwick, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Gische, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Danielson 9 NY3d 342 at 348 p. 494
- People v. Benevento 91 NY2d 708 at 713-714 p. 494
- Strickland v. Washington 466 US 668 p. 494
- People v. Perry 266 AD2d 151 at 152 p. 494