Majority
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, J.), rendered October 19, 2011, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the first degree, robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree (two counts), attempted robbery in the first degree, attempted robbery in the
Defendant’s legal sufficiency claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. We also find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 , 348-349 [2007]). Defendant’s guilt was established through identification testimony, confessions and persuasive circumstantial evidence.
We have considered and rejected defendant’s pro se claims.
We find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated.
Concur — Sweeny, J.E, Renwick, DeGrasse, Clark and Kapnick, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Danielson 9 NY3d 342 at 348-349 p. 512