Majority
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Melvin L. Schweitzer, J.), entered on September 5, 2014, which, upon reargument, granted defendant’s motion
Plaintiffs’ claims against defendant’s predecessor in interest were carved out from the release at issue; accordingly, those claims are not precluded as a matter of law (CDR Créances S.A.S. v Cohen, 104 AD3d 17 , 29 [1st Dept 2012], affd in relevant part 23 NY3d 307 [2014]). The carve-out provision was intended to specifically anticipate the arguments raised by defendant. By enforcing the carve-out provision, this Court is giving effect to the intent of the parties to the release (Evans v Famous Music Corp., 1 NY3d 452 , 458 [2004]).
Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Feinman and Clark, JJ.
Cases cited
- CDR Créances S.A.S. v. Cohen 104 AD3d 17 at 29 p. 509
- CDR Créances S.A.S. v. Cohen 23 NY3d 307 p. 509
- Evans v. Famous Music Corp. 1 NY3d 452 at 458 p. 509