← Cases

People v. Armstrong

127 A.D.3d 1100 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2015-04-22 English

Judges Eng, P.J., Dillon, Leventhal, Cohen and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Contents

Majority

p. 1100
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ivan Armstrong, Appellant.
[5 NYS3d 890]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), imposed March 15, 2013, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

p. 1101
The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 , 265 [2011]; People v Rennick, 123 AD3d 1146 [2014]; People v Reyes, 121 AD3d 820 [2014]; People v Coleman, 116 AD3d 708 [2014]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Dillon, Leventhal, Cohen and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Cases cited