Majority
Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McCann, J.), imposed October 5, 2011, which, upon the granting of his motion pursuant to CPL 440.20 to set aside
Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the resentencing court did not fail to independently exercise its discretion to determine an appropriate sentence (see People v Iliff, 115 AD3d 764 [2014]; People v Seymour, 21 AD3d 1292 [2005]; cf. People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302 [1981]). Taking into account all of the relevant circumstances, the resentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Ortiz, 84 AD3d 1118 [2011]; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Chambers, J.P., Dickerson, LaSalle and Barros, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Iliff 115 AD3d 764 p. 1229
- People v. Seymour 21 AD3d 1292 p. 1229
- People v. Farrar 52 NY2d 302 p. 1229
- People v. Suitte 90 AD2d 80 p. 1229