Majority
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County, (Jeong, J.), imposed January 23, 2013, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid. The record fails to establish that the defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 , 272-273 [2011]). An appeal waiver is not valid unless the defendant’s understanding of the waiver is evident on the face of the record (id. at 264-265; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 , 256 [2006]). Here, the trial court’s statement to the defendant that
Upon review, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Eng, P.J., Skelos, Leventhal, Roman and Duffy, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Bradshaw 18 NY3d 257 at 272-273 p. 1235, p. 1236
- People v. Lopez 6 NY3d 248 at 256 p. 1235
- People v. Brown 122 AD3d 133 at 141 p. 1236
- People v. Oquendo 105 AD3d 447 at 448 p. 1236
- People v. Vasquez 101 AD3d 1054 at 1054-1055 p. 1236
- People v. Boustani 300 AD2d 313 at 314 p. 1236
- People v. Crawford 110 AD3d 916 at 916 p. 1236
- People v. Suitte 90 AD2d 80 p. 1236