Majority
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, refused a correction officer’s
We confirm. The detailed misbehavior report, testimony of the correction officer who authored the report and video of the incident provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Smith v Quinn, 120 AD3d 1509 , 1510 [2014]; Matter of Toliver v Commissioner of N.Y. State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 107 AD3d 1263 , 1263 [2013]). Contrary to petitioner’s claim, the written statement setting forth the evidence relied upon adequately complied with the regulatory requirements (see 7 NYCRR 254.7 [a] [5]; Matter of Gonzalez v Annucci, 122 AD3d 1203 , 1204 [2014]; Matter of Ortega v Annucci, 122 AD3d 1051 , 1051 [2014]). Further, the record establishes that petitioner’s right to present witnesses was not infringed (see generally Matter of Hill v Selsky, 19 AD3d 64 , 66-67 [2005]).
Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Clark, JJ., concur.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Cases cited
- Smith v. Quinn 120 AD3d 1509 at 1510 p. 1480
- Toliver v. Commissioner of New York State Department of Corrections & Community Supervision 107 AD3d 1263 at 1263 p. 1480
- Gonzalez v. Annucci 122 AD3d 1203 at 1204 p. 1480
- Ortega v. Annucci 122 AD3d 1051 at 1051 p. 1480
- Hill v. Selsky 19 AD3d 64 at 66-67 p. 1480