Majority
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney,
The court improvidently exercised its discretion by refusing to vacate the severance order, where the actions had a common nucleus of facts, no party had been seeking severance at the time, and no party had opposed NYCHA’s motion to vacate the sua sponte grant of severance. Nor had any party argued that they would be prejudiced by a joint trial of the main and third-party actions, or that such trial would result in substantial delay (see Shanley v Callanan Indus., 54 NY2d 52 , 57 [1981]; Vecciarelli v King Pharms., Inc., 71 AD3d 595 , 596 [1st Dept 2010]; Sichel v Community Synagogue, 256 AD2d 276 [1st Dept 1998]).
Concur — Friedman, J.P., Acosta, Moskowitz, Richter and Kapnick, JJ.
Cases cited
- Shanley v. Callanan Industries, Inc. 54 NY2d 52 at 57 p. 435
- Vecciarelli v. King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 71 AD3d 595 at 596 p. 435
- Sichel v. Community Synagogue 256 AD2d 276 p. 435