Majority
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered March 11, 2014, which granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the proceeding, denied the petition seeking to annul respondent’s determination dated March 7, 2011, which terminated petitioner’s employment as a Principal Court Reporter, and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Supreme Court correctly dismissed the proceeding as time-
We find no basis for applying the doctrine of equitable estoppel to toll the period between petitioner’s termination and her demand for arbitration. The record shows that, before the expiration of the statute of limitations, petitioner knew or should have known of the proper mechanisms to challenge respondent’s determination (see Zumpano v Quinn, 6 NY3d 666 , 674 [2006] [equitable estoppel did not apply where the plaintiff had sufficient knowledge to bring a timely action]).
We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Friedman, J.P., Moskowitz, DeGrasse and Kapnick, JJ.
Cases cited
- Vadell v. City of New York Health & Hospitals Corp. 233 AD2d 224 at 225 p. 479
- Joseph Francese, Inc. v. Enlarged City School District 95 NY2d 59 at 61-62 p. 479
- Zumpano v. Quinn 6 NY3d 666 at 674 p. 479