Majority
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), dated December 13, 2013, which, after a hearing, denied his motion to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46 on his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), which sentence was originally imposed on October 24, 2003.
Ordered that the order is affirmed.
A defendant who is eligible for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46 enjoys “a presumption in favor of granting a motion for resentencing relief” (People v Beasley, 47 AD3d 639 , 641 [2008]; see CPL 440.46 [3]; L 2004, ch 738, § 23). However, resentencing is not automatic, and may be denied upon a showing that “substantial justice dictates” such denial (People v Beasley, 47 AD3d at 641 ; see CPL 440.46 [3]; L 2004, ch 738, § 23; People v Vega, 40 AD3d 1020 , 1020-1021 [2007]).
Here, considering all of the circumstances relevant to the de
Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Vega 40 AD3d 1020 at 1020-1021 p. 867