Hyperlawhypertext legal database Domingez v. Zinnar 130 A.D.3d 414

← Cases

Domingez v. Zinnar

130 A.D.3d 414 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2015-07-02 English

Contents

Majority

p. 414
Soledad Domingez et al., Respondents, and Elsia Vasquez, Appellant, v Ilan Zinnar et al., Defendants, et al., Intervenors.
[11 NYS3d 484]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J.), entered on or about March 25, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiffs-respondents’ counsel’s motion to confirm a referee’s report setting a charging lien in favor of counsel, and denied plaintiff

p. 415
Vasquez’s cross motion for renewal and reconsideration of counsel’s prior motion for a charging lien, unanimously affirmed with respect to counsel’s motion, and the appeal therefrom otherwise dismissed, without costs.

Vasquez’s cross motion seeking renewal and reconsideration is deemed a motion to reargue, since Vasquez did not point to any new fact that would change the prior determination (see Pullman v Silverman, 125 AD3d 562 , 563 [1st Dept 2015]). Therefore, the denial of Vasquez’s cross motion is not appeal-able (id.).

The motion court providently exercised its discretion in confirming the Referee’s report, as the report is supported by the record (Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v Occidental Gems, Inc., 11 NY3d 843 , 845 [2008]). Concur— Gonzalez, P.J., Sweeny, Renwick, Saxe and Feinman, JJ.

Cases cited