Majority
Appeal from a corrected order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Kings
Ordered that the corrected order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the father’s contention, the Family Court was entitled to draw a negative inference against him based upon his failure to testify at the fact-finding hearing (see Baxter v Palmigiano, 425 US 308 , 318 [1976]; Matter of Nassau County Dept. of Social Servs. v Denise J., 87 NY2d 73 , 79 [1995]; Matter of Jackson F. [Gabriel F], 121 AD3d 1114 , 1115 [2014]; Matter of Mylasia P. [Brenda P.], 104 AD3d 856 , 856 [2013]; Matter of Natalie T. [Roger T.], 104 AD3d 697 , 698 [2013]).
The Family Court also properly refused to admit into evidence a recording containing alleged prior inconsistent statements of the mother since the father failed to lay a proper foundation for its admission (see People v Duncan, 46 NY2d 74 , 80-81 [1978]; People v Stokes, 126 AD3d 1018 , 1018 [2015]; People v Sawyer, 304 AD2d 775 , 776 [2003]).
The father’s remaining contention is without merit. Rivera, J.R, Dickerson, Cohen and Barros, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Baxter v. Palmigiano 425 US 308 at 318 p. 743
- Nassau County Department of Social Services ex. rel. Dante M. v. Denise J. 87 NY2d 73 at 79 p. 743
- In re Jackson F. 121 AD3d 1114 at 1115 p. 743
- In re Mylasia P. 104 AD3d 856 at 856 p. 743
- In re Natalie T. 104 AD3d 697 at 698 p. 743
- People v. Duncan 46 NY2d 74 at 80-81 p. 743