Majority
In an action, in effect, pursuant to Insurance Law § 5106 (c) for a de novo determination of a claim for no-fault insurance benefits, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bunyan, J.), dated October 30, 2013, which granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (2) to dismiss the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The complaint, in effect, sought a de novo determination of the plaintiff’s no-fault claim pursuant to Insurance Law § 5106 (c). “The statute permits an insurer or a claimant to institute a court action to adjudicate the dispute de novo where the master arbitrator’s award is $5,000 or greater” (Green v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. Trust, 16 AD3d 457 , 457 [2005]). Here, the master arbitrator, by vacating the arbitrator’s award in its entirety, ef
Cases cited
- Green v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 16 AD3d 457 at 457 p. 764
- General Accident Fire & Life Insurance v. Avlonitis 156 AD2d 424 at 424 p. 765
- Sansiviero v. Royal Globe Insurance 109 AD2d 840 at 842 p. 765