In re Tendler — 131 A.D.3d 1301

Majority

p. 1301

In the Matter of Anya A. Tendler, an Attorney.

[16 NYS3d 185]

Anya A. Tendler was admitted to practice by the

p. 1302

First Department in 2009, and currently maintains an office for the practice of law in the Town of Canton, St. Lawrence County.

On October 28, 2014, Tendler pleaded guilty to one count of aggravated driving while intoxicated (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [2-a] [b]), a felony. The Committee on Professional Standards now moves pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a) and (b) to strike Tendler’s name from the roll of attorneys. By affirmation in response, dated August 17, 2015, Tendler opposes the motion on the ground that she was not convicted of a felony as defined in Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a) and (e). Alternatively, Tendler requests that the subject motion be held in abeyance for four months pending completion of her interim probation.

Tendler was automatically disbarred and ceased to be an attorney by operation of law in October 2014 when she entered her guilty plea to a felony, which, for attorney discipline purposes, served as the equivalent of a conviction (see Judiciary Law § 90 [4]; Matter of Montague, 130 AD3d 1297 , 1298 [2015]; Matter of Sanderson, 119 AD3d 1318 , 1318 [2014]; Matter of Reidy, 77 AD3d 1276 , 1276 [2010]). Consequently, “[the Committee’s] motion to strike [Tendler’s] name from the [roll] of attorneys [is] a formality which merely confirms [Tendler’s] disbarred status” (Matter of Montague, 130 AD3d at 1298 ; see Matter of Brunet, 106 AD3d 1443 , 1443 [2013]; Matter of Sanderson, 119 AD3d at 1318 ). The terms of Tendler’s underlying plea agreement, meanwhile, do not mandate a different result. While an attorney’s disbarment upon a plea of guilty to a felony is automatic, the fact that her plea agreement contemplates the subsequent withdrawal of her felony guilty plea upon successful completion of a period of interim probation, leaving only a plea to a misdemeanor offense, would not serve to automatically restore her to the bar—to attain said relief, she must make a motion for reinstatement (cf. Matter of Toro v Malcolm, 44 NY2d 146 , 152 [1978]; Matter of Montague, 130 AD3d at 1298 ; see also Matter of Harding, 73 AD3d 148 , 149 [2010]).

Therefore, we grant the Committee’s motion and strike Tendler’s name from the roll of attorneys nunc pro tunc to October 28, 2014.

McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the motion of the Committee on Professional Standards is granted; and it is further ordered that Anya A. Tendler’s name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective nunc

p. 1303

pro tunc to October 28, 2014; and it is further ordered that Anya A. Tendler is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as a principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and Tendler is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further ordered that Anya A. Tendler shall comply with the provisions of this Court’s rules regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys (see Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.9).

Cases cited

In re Montague 130 AD3d 1297 N.Y. App. Div. 2015-07-16 at 1298 p. 1302
In re Sanderson 119 AD3d 1318 N.Y. App. Div. 2014-07-31 at 1318 p. 1302
In re Reidy 77 AD3d 1276 N.Y. App. Div. 2010-10-28 at 1276 p. 1302
In re Harding 73 AD3d 148 N.Y. App. Div. 2010-02-23 at 149 p. 1302

Statutes and regulations cited

Judiciary Law p. 1302