Majority
Family Court properly determined that petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case that respondent, her daughter, committed any of the family offenses alleged in the petition to warrant issuance of an order of protection. Petitioner testified in conclusory fashion that her daughter entered her home without permission, stole property, and broke the door, but she did not testify she personally observed her daughter do so, or how she otherwise knew that her daughter committed the alleged offenses (see Matter of Charles E. v Frank E., 72 AD3d 1439 [3d Dept 2010]).
Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Cases cited
- Charles E. v. Frank E. 72 AD3d 1439 p. 893