Majority
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Melvin L. Schweitzer, J.), entered January 16, 2015, which denied defendant Philip Eytan’s motion to dismiss the complaint as against him, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted, and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
The motion court should have granted defendant’s motion. The complaint alleges that defendant knew of and participated in the alleged fraudulent transfer of assets but fails to allege that he is the transferee, and further fails to allege, in anything other than conclusory fashion, that he benefited from the transfer, as required to state a cause of action for fraudulent conveyance (Debtor and Creditor Law §§ 273, 276; Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v Porco, 75 NY2d 840 , 842 [1990]; Symbax, Inc. v Bingaman, 219 AD2d 552 , 553-554 [1st Dept 1995]). Moreover, while defendant is an officer of both defendant transferor and transferee corporations, “receipt of a salary from the
Concur — Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Richter and Gische, JJ.
Cases cited
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Porco 75 NY2d 840 at 842 p. 402
- Symbax, Inc. v. Bingaman 219 AD2d 552 at 553-554 p. 402
- D'Mel & Associates v. Athco, Inc. 105 AD3d 451 at 452-453 p. 403