Majority
Judgment, Su
Defendant’s argument that his guilty plea was invalid because the court failed to advise him of one of his rights under Boykin v Alabama ( 395 US 238 [1969]) is unpreserved (see e.g. People v Jackson, 114 AD3d 807 [2d Dept 2014], lv denied 22 NY3d 1199 [2014]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Unlike the situation in People v Tyrell ( 22 NY3d 359 , 364 [2013]), defendant had the opportunity to move to withdraw his plea or otherwise raise the issue, and the deficiency did not rise to the level of a mode of proceedings error. As an alternative holding, we find that the record establishes the voluntariness of the plea (see Tyrell, 22 NY3d at 365 ; see also People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9 , 16-19 [1983]).
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
Concur— Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.
Cases cited
- Boykin v. Alabama 395 US 238 p. 442
- People v. Jackson 114 AD3d 807 p. 442
- People v. Tyrell 22 NY3d 359 at 364 p. 442
- People v. Harris 61 NY2d 9 at 16-19 p. 442