Majority
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 , 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. Defendant’s course of conduct during a violent struggle with a police officer, including gripping and repeatedly tugging at the officer’s pistol and holster, warranted an inference that defendant intended to seize the pistol (see People v Adair, 84 AD3d 1752 , 1753 [4th Dept 2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 812 [2011]).
The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. At the time defendant swallowed what appeared to be bags of drugs, the police had, at least, a founded suspicion of criminality warranting a common-law inquiry, and they did not subject defendant to any intrusion beyond a direction to stop, which did not constitute a seizure (see People v Bora, 83 NY2d 531 , 532-535 [1994]). In any event, the totality of the information available to the police also amounted to reasonable suspicion.
Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Acosta, Renwick and Moskowitz, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Danielson 9 NY3d 342 at 348-349 p. 489
- People v. Bora 83 NY2d 531 at 532-535 p. 489