Majority
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Módica, J.), rendered April 16, 2013, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of the defendant’s motion to suppress his statements to law enforcement officials.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, raised in his pro se supplemental brief, the Supreme Court properly denied his motion to suppress his statements to law enforcement officials. The evidence presented at the suppression hearing supports the Supreme Court’s determination that the defendant’s statements were not the product of a custodial interrogation improperly conducted without the benefit of prior Miranda warnings (see People v Yukl, 25 NY2d 585 [1969]; People v Warren, 124 AD3d 699 [2015]; Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 [1966]; People v Marcelle, 120 AD3d 833 [2014]; People v Williams, 97 AD3d 769 [2012]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions, raised in his pro se supplemental brief, are either without merit or not properly before this Court.
Eng, P.J., Dillon, Sgroi and Maltese, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Lopez 6 NY3d 248 at 256 p. 915
- People v. Bradshaw 18 NY3d 257 at 267 p. 915
- People v. Jemmott 125 AD3d 1005 p. 915
- People v. Sanders 112 AD3d 748 p. 915
- People v. Sanders 25 NY3d 337 p. 915
- People v. Yukl 25 NY2d 585 p. 915
- Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436 p. 915
- People v. Marcelle 120 AD3d 833 p. 915
- People v. Williams 97 AD3d 769 p. 915
- People v. Suitte 90 AD2d 80 p. 915