Hyperlawhypertext legal database Express Elevator Construction Co. v. Rashti Construction Corp. 133 A.D.3d 417

← Cases

Express Elevator Construction Co. v. Rashti Construction Corp.

133 A.D.3d 417 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2015-11-05 English

Contents

Majority

p. 417
Express Elevator Construction Co., Inc., Respondent, v Rashti Construction Corp. et al., Appellants.
[18 NYS3d 528]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur F. Engoron, J.), entered July 11, 2014, after a nonjury trial, in favor of plaintiff in the total amount of $104,158.31, and declaring that (1) plaintiff had a good, valid, and subsisting mechanic’s lien against defendants’ building; and (2) the building be sold and plaintiff receive the amount of the judgment from the proceeds of the sale, plus the expenses of the sale, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The trial court’s findings that defendants unjustifiably canceled their contract with plaintiff, locked plaintiff out of the work site, and refused to pay the remainder of the contract price, is supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence (see Claridge Gardens v Menotti, 160 AD2d 544 , 545 [1st Dept 1990];

p. 418
409-411 Sixth St., LLC v Mogi, 22 NY3d 875 , 876-877 [2013]). Defendants failed to establish that plaintiff breached the contract by using “used,” rather than new, elevator parts. Defendants’ challenges to the trial court’s “findings of fact rest in large measure on considerations relating to the credibility of witnesses” (id.), and we find no basis to disturb those findings (see Horsford v Bacott, 32 AD3d 310 , 312 [1st Dept 2006], affd 8 NY3d 874 [2007]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Acosta, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Cases cited