Majority
Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), imposed June 26, 2012, upon his convic
Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
Since the defendant had not yet completed his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to include statutorily required periods of post-release supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 , 630-633 [2011]; People v Kearney, 116 AD3d 1064 [2014]; People v Rogers, 105 AD3d 776 , 777 [2013]). Leventhal, J.P., Austin, Roman, Miller and Barros, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Lingle 16 NY3d 621 at 630-633 p. 873
- People v. Kearney 116 AD3d 1064 p. 873
- People v. Rogers 105 AD3d 776 at 777 p. 873