Majority
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of an escrow agreement, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Fusco, J.), dated December 3, 2013, which granted the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 325 (e) to remove this action to the Surrogate’s Court, New York County.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court and the Surrogate’s Court have concurrent jurisdiction over the administration of a decedent’s estate (see Goodwin v Rice, 79 AD3d 699 , 699-700 [2010]; Cipo v Van Blerkom, 28 AD3d 602 [2006]; Gaentner v Benkovich, 18 AD3d 424 , 428 [2005]). “However, ‘[w] her ever possible, all litigation
Cases cited
- Goodwin v. Rice 79 AD3d 699 at 699-700 p. 766
- Cipo v. Blerkom 28 AD3d 602 p. 766
- Gaentner v. Benkovich 18 AD3d 424 at 428 p. 766
- Nichols v. Kruger 113 AD2d 878 at 878-879 p. 767
- Birnbaum v. Central Trust Co. 156 AD2d 309 at 310 p. 767
- Burmax Co. v. B & S Industries, Inc. 135 AD2d 599 at 601-602 p. 767
- Benjamin v. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. 173 AD2d 373 at 374 p. 767