Majority
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George R. Villegas, J., at plea and original sentencing; John S. Moore, J., at
Initially, we need not address the issue of whether defendant’s challenge to his plea has been preserved, as we consider this claim pursuant to our interest of justice jurisdiction (CPL 470.15 [3] [c]).
Defendant was not informed by the court of any of the rights he was waiving by pleading guilty (see Boykin v Alabama, 395 US 238 [1969]). While “the failure to recite the Boykin rights does not automatically invalidate an otherwise voluntary and intelligent plea . . . the record as a whole [must] affirmatively show[ ] that the defendant intentionally relinquished those rights” in order for the plea to be validly entered (People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375 , 2015 NY Slip Op 08615 , *2 [2015]). In this case, since the record is devoid of any indicia that would meet this standard, the plea must be vacated and that matter remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. Concur— Sweeny, J.P., Saxe, Richter and Gische, JJ.
Cases cited
- Boykin v. Alabama 395 US 238 p. 587
- People v. Conceicao 26 NY3d 375 at 2015 p. 587