Majority
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.),
Plaintiff moved to amend the caption of the within action to name Montefiore Medical Center as a defendant in the “summons and complaint.” To the extent plaintiff seeks to add Montefiore as a named party defendant to this medical malpractice action by this motion, the court improvidently exercised its discretion in permitting her to serve a supplemental summons and amended complaint on Montefiore, especially where she failed to submit a copy of her proposed pleadings and an affidavit of merit with her motion to amend (see Perez v Paramount Communications, 92 NY2d 749 , 754 [1999]; Torchia v Garvey, 118 AD3d 426 [1st Dept 2014]).
However, in light of the minimal delay in making the motion, and the fact that the motion was made prior to the statute of limitations’ expiration, plaintiff may submit proper papers, including a medical expert’s affidavit of merit, so that the court may examine the proposed pleading for sufficiency (see Thomas Crimmins Contr. Co. v City of New York, 74 NY2d 166 , 170 [1989]; Ancrum v St. Barnabas Hosp., 301 AD2d 474 , 475 [1st Dept 2003]). Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, ManzanetDaniels and Gische, JJ.
Cases cited
- Perez v. Paramount Communications, Inc. 92 NY2d 749 at 754 p. 605
- Torchia v. Garvey 118 AD3d 426 p. 605
- Thomas Crimmins Contracting Co. v. City of New York 74 NY2d 166 at 170 p. 605
- Ancrum v. St. Barnabas Hospital 301 AD2d 474 at 475 p. 605