Majority
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered January 25, 2013, convicting him of assault in the second degree and unlawful possession of marihuana, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court excused potential jurors based upon hardship without conducting a sufficient inquiry is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Valenko, 126 AD3d 1020 [2015]; People v Boyd, 125 AD3d 992 [2015]; People v Racks, 125 AD3d 692 [2015]). In any event, the defendant’s contention is without merit (see People v Bruce, 130 AD3d 938 , 938 [2015]; People v Johnson, 116 AD3d 883 , 883 [2014]; People v Umana, 76 AD3d 1111 , 1112 [2010]; People v Toussaint, 40 AD3d 1017 , 1017-1018 [2007]).
The defendant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence with respect to assault in the second degree is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484 , 492 [2008]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 , 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of that crime beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 , 349 [2007]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 , 495 [1987]; People v Vincent, 80 AD3d 633 , 634 [2011]).
Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d at 348-349 ; People v Vincent, 80 AD3d at 634 ), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383 , 410 [2004]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d at 495 ). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt as to that crime was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]; People v Pelosi, 128 AD3d 733 [2015]). Chambers, J.P., Hall, Austin and Barros, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Valenko 126 AD3d 1020 p. 876
- People v. Racks 125 AD3d 692 p. 876
- People v. Bruce 130 AD3d 938 at 938 p. 876
- People v. Toussaint 40 AD3d 1017 at 1017-1018 p. 876
- People v. Hawkins 11 NY3d 484 at 492 p. 876
- People v. Contes 60 NY2d 620 at 621 p. 876
- People v. Danielson 9 NY3d 342 at 349 p. 876
- People v. Bleakley 69 NY2d 490 at 495 p. 876
- People v. Vincent 80 AD3d 633 at 634 p. 876
- People v. Romero 7 NY3d 633 p. 876