Majority
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Efrain Alvarado, J.), entered July 3, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant’s motion for an order conditionally sealing the record of a judgment of conviction of the same court (Joseph A. Mazur, J.), rendered April 22, 1991, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Because defendant’s 1991 felony drug conviction was not a conviction that “resulted in the defendant’s participation in [a] judicially sanctioned drug treatment program,” (CPL 160.58 [2]), he was not entitled to conditional sealing of the records of that conviction, notwithstanding that he successfully completed drug treatment on a later conviction and the court sealed the records of that conviction. The quoted language specifically limits sealing to the particular case in which a defendant completes drug treatment. “Moreover, as a matter of statutory construction, the Legislature’s creation of [a provision for sealing prior misdemeanors] implies that [prior felonies] are not [in] eluded” (Matter of Jonathan V., 55 AD3d 273 , 277 [1st Dept 2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 713 [2008]). Since the 1991 conviction was for a felony, the court correctly determined that it had
We note that the People do not raise any issue of appeal-ability, and we assume, without deciding, that the order is appealable as a civil order relating to a criminal matter (see People v M.E., 121 AD3d 157 , 159 [4th Dept 2014]).
Concur— Saxe, J.P., Moskowitz, Richter and Feinman, JJ.
Cases cited
- In re Jonathan V. 55 AD3d 273 at 277 p. 449
- People v. M.E. 121 AD3d 157 at 159 p. 450