Majority
— Judgment, Supreme
As to the appeal from the judgment of conviction, we find that defendant did not make a valid waiver of his right to appeal, but we perceive no basis for reducing the period of post-release supervision.
As to defendant’s civil appeal from his sex offender adjudication, the record supports the court’s determination that defendant is subject to the presumptive override for a prior felony sex crime conviction, which results in a level three adjudication independent of any point assessments. The court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were outweighed by the seriousness of defendant’s underlying crimes and the recency of the prior felony sex crime.
Concur — Friedman, J.R, Acosta, Andrias, Saxe and Feinman, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Gillotti 23 NY3d 841 p. 472