Majority
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated July 11, 2013, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the People’s contention, this appeal from an
A defendant seeking a downward departure from the presumptive risk level has the initial burden of “(1) identifying, as a matter of law, an appropriate mitigating factor, namely, a factor which tends to establish a lower likelihood of reoffense or danger to the community and is of a kind, or to a degree, that is otherwise not adequately taken into account by the [SORA] Guidelines; and (2) establishing the facts in support of its existence by a preponderance of the evidence” (People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112 , 128 [2011]; see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). Here, the mitigating factors identified by the defendant were either adequately taken into account by the SORA Guidelines or did not warrant a downward departure from the presumptive risk level (see People v Gelin, 128 AD3d 657 [2015]).
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s request for a downward departure from his presumptive designation as a level two sex offender.
Leventhal, J.P., Dickerson, Roman and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Edwards 117 AD3d 418 p. 1098
- People v. Scott 113 AD3d 491 p. 1098
- People v. Wyatt 89 AD3d 112 at 128 p. 1098
- People v. Gillotti 23 NY3d 841 p. 1098
- People v. Gelin 128 AD3d 657 p. 1098