← Cases

Barash v. Baharestani

138 A.D.3d 489 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2016-04-12 English

Judges Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe, Richter and Kahn, JJ.

Contents

Majority

p. 489
Alon Barash, Appellant, v Steven Baharestani et al., Respondents.
[28 NYS3d 300]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), entered October 28, 2014, which granted defendants’ pre-answer motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Even when considering plaintiff’s affidavit, which may be

p. 490
considered to remedy pleading defects (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83 , 88 [1994]), plaintiffs own allegations establish that he was a licensed real estate salesperson, not a licensed broker. Therefore, he is barred from demanding compensation for services he rendered in connection with the individual defendant’s purchase of an apartment (see Real Property Law § 442-a).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe, Richter and Kahn, JJ.

Cases cited