Majority
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Knopf, J.), dated February 10, 2014, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In seeking a departure from the presumptive risk level, a defendant must first identify a mitigating circumstance or circumstances “of a kind or to a degree not adequately taken into account by the [Sex Offender Registration Act] guidelines” (People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 , 861 [2014]; see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 4 [2006] [hereinafter the Guidelines]). The defendant then has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence the existence of those circumstances in his or her case (see
Here, the mitigating circumstances identified by the defendant either were adequately taken into account by the Guidelines, or were not proven by a preponderance of the evidence (see People v Santiago, 137 AD3d 762 [2d Dept 2016]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s application for a downward departure.
Rivera, J.P., Miller, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Gillotti 23 NY3d 841 at 861 p. 946
- People v. Wyatt 89 AD3d 112 at 128 p. 947
- People v. Santiago 137 AD3d 762 p. 947