Hyperlawhypertext legal database People v. Harris 142 A.D.3d 1391

← Cases

People v. Harris

142 A.D.3d 1391 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2016-09-30 English

Judges Present— Peradotto, J.P., Carni, DeJoseph, NeMoyer and Curran, JJ.

Contents

Majority

p. 1391
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Cleophis Harris, Appellant.
[38 NYS3d 477]

Appeal from a judgment of the Chautauqua County Court (John T. Ward, J.), rendered July 14, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convict

p. 1392
ing him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court did not ignore his oral motion to withdraw his plea or fail to set forth for judicial review any decision with respect thereto. Instead, the court explicitly and properly denied defendant’s oral motion to withdraw the plea based upon the absence of any record support for defendant’s conclusory assertion that his guilty plea had been coerced (see People v Allen, 99 AD3d 1252 , 1252 [2012]). Furthermore, the court accorded defendant a reasonable opportunity to present his contentions and did not “abuse its discretion in concluding that no further inquiry was necessary” (P eople v Strasser, 83 AD3d 1411 , 1411 [2011]; cf. People v Days, 125 AD3d 1508 , 1508-1509 [2015]).

Contrary to his further contention, defendant was not “deprived of effective assistance of counsel at sentencing based on his attorney’s refusal to incorporate the arguments raised by defendant at sentencing into [a] written motion to withdraw defendant’s plea” (People v Green, 132 AD3d 1268 , 1269 [2015], lv denied 27 NY3d 1069 [2016]). Furthermore, “defense counsel’s failure to join in [defendant’s oral] motion did not constitute ineffective assistance” (People v Weinstock, 129 AD3d 1663 , 1664 [2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 1012 [2015]).

Present— Peradotto, J.P., Carni, DeJoseph, NeMoyer and Curran, JJ.

Cases cited