Majority
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Erin P. Gall, J.), entered July 20, 2015. The order, inter alia, granted the
It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order granting petitioner’s application for authorization to administer medication to respondent over his objection. The order has since expired, rendering this appeal moot (see Matter of Bosco [Quinton F.], 100 AD3d 1525 , 1526 [2012]). Contrary to respondent’s contention, this case does not fall within the exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of McGrath, 245 AD2d 1081 , 1082 [1997]; see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707 , 714-715 [1980]).
Present—Whalen, P.J., Peradotto, NeMoyer, Curran and Troutman, JJ.
Cases cited
- In re Bosco 100 AD3d 1525 at 1526 p. 1594
- Hearst Corp. v. Clyne 50 NY2d 707 at 714-715 p. 1594