Hyperlawhypertext legal database Rogers v. Clancy 144 A.D.3d 423

← Cases

Rogers v. Clancy

144 A.D.3d 423 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2016-11-01 English

Judges Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Acosta, Andrias, Manzanet-Daniels and Webber, JJ.

Contents

Majority

p. 423
In the Matter of Marcus Rogers, Petitioner, v Margaret L. Clancy et al., Respondents.
[39 NYS3d 778]

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Acosta, Andrias, Manzanet-Daniels and Webber, JJ.