Majority
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Michael J. Gross, J., at suppression motion; John S. Moore, J., at plea and
Although we do not find that defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Powell, 140 AD3d 401 [1st Dept 2016]), we find that the motion court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion, without granting a hearing. Defendant failed to offer any facts that would support an allegation that he had an objectively reasonable expectation of privacy in a bag containing a pistol and ammunition, and the prosecution’s version of the incident did not support such a claim (see People v Burton, 6 NY3d 584 , 587 [2006]; People v Ramirez-Portoreal, 88 NY2d 99 , 110 [1996]). Furthermore, aside from the issue of standing, defendant failed to offer any facts to rebut the assertions in the felony complaint, voluntary disclosure form and the People’s response to his motion, demonstrating that the police conduct was lawful, and that the codefendant abandoned the bag (see e.g. People v Velez, 281 AD2d 311 [1st Dept 2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 908 [2001]).
Concur—Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe, Kapnick and Gesmer, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Powell 140 AD3d 401 p. 600
- People v. Burton 6 NY3d 584 at 587 p. 600
- People v. Ramirez-Portoreal 88 NY2d 99 at 110 p. 600