Majority
Appeal by the
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California ( 386 US 738 [1967]), and we have also reviewed the defendant’s pro se supplemental brief. Upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).
Balkin, J.R, Chambers, Roman, Duffy and Barros, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Anders v. California 386 US 738 p. 847
- In re Giovanni S. 89 AD3d 252 p. 847
- People v. Gonzalez 47 NY2d 606 p. 847